53. Maximum Subarray
easyAsked at Juniper NetworksFind the contiguous subarray with the largest sum using Kadane's algorithm. Juniper engineers recognize this O(n) pattern when analyzing network throughput time series — finding the burst window with the highest cumulative data rate is the same greedy subarray problem.
By Alex Chen, Founder, InterviewChamp.AI · Last verified
Source citations
Public interview reports confirming this problem appears in Juniper Networks loops.
- Glassdoor (2026-Q1)— Reported in Juniper SWE onsite reports as a frequent array/greedy question.
- Blind (2025-11)— Listed in Juniper candidate prep threads as a must-know classic.
Problem
Given an integer array nums, find the subarray with the largest sum, and return its sum.
Constraints
1 <= nums.length <= 10^5−10^4 <= nums[i] <= 10^4
Examples
Example 1
nums = [-2,1,-3,4,-1,2,1,-5,4]6Explanation: Subarray [4,-1,2,1] has the largest sum = 6.
Example 2
nums = [1]1Explanation: Single element is the subarray.
Example 3
nums = [5,4,-1,7,8]23Explanation: The entire array is the optimal subarray.
Approaches
1. Brute force — O(n²)
Try every subarray start and end pair, compute the sum, track the maximum.
- Time
- O(n²)
- Space
- O(1)
function maxSubArray(nums) {
let max = -Infinity;
for (let i = 0; i < nums.length; i++) {
let sum = 0;
for (let j = i; j < nums.length; j++) {
sum += nums[j];
max = Math.max(max, sum);
}
}
return max;
}Tradeoff: O(n²). Use this to illustrate the suboptimal approach, then pivot to Kadane's.
2. Kadane's algorithm — O(n)
At each index, decide whether to extend the current subarray or start fresh. The running sum is: max(nums[i], currentSum + nums[i]).
- Time
- O(n)
- Space
- O(1)
function maxSubArray(nums) {
let currentSum = nums[0];
let maxSum = nums[0];
for (let i = 1; i < nums.length; i++) {
currentSum = Math.max(nums[i], currentSum + nums[i]);
maxSum = Math.max(maxSum, currentSum);
}
return maxSum;
}Tradeoff: O(n) time, O(1) space. Kadane's algorithm. The greedy decision at each step (extend vs restart) is optimal because a negative running sum only hurts future sums.
Juniper Networks-specific tips
Name Kadane's algorithm explicitly — Juniper interviewers will probe whether you know classical algorithms by name. Explain the greedy intuition: if the running sum goes negative, it is always better to start fresh from the current element. Draw the analogy to network monitoring: finding the peak throughput window in a stream of delta samples uses the same pattern.
Common mistakes
- Initializing maxSum to 0 — fails on all-negative arrays; initialize to nums[0].
- Not seeding currentSum with nums[0] — the loop should start at index 1.
- Confusing maximum subarray sum with maximum subarray length.
- Using a divide-and-conquer approach without knowing its O(n log n) cost — Kadane is strictly better.
Follow-up questions
An interviewer at Juniper Networks may pivot to one of these next:
- Return the actual subarray indices, not just the sum.
- Maximum Product Subarray (LC 152) — Kadane's analog for products; need to track both max and min.
- How would you solve this for a circular array (LC 918)?
Solve it now
Free. No sign-up. Python and JavaScript run instantly in your browser.
FAQ
What if all numbers are negative?
Kadane's handles it because we initialize both currentSum and maxSum to nums[0] and the loop starts at index 1. The single least-negative element is returned.
Does the subarray have to be non-empty?
Yes per the problem statement. Initializing to nums[0] enforces this.
How would you track the actual subarray bounds?
Keep start, end, and tempStart indices. Reset tempStart to i when you restart the subarray (currentSum becomes nums[i]). Update start and end when maxSum is updated.
Practice these live with InterviewChamp.AI
Drill Maximum Subarray and other Juniper Networks interview questions under real-loop conditions with instant feedback on your reasoning, complexity claims, and code.
Practice these live with InterviewChamp.AI →