139. Word Break
mediumAsked at LinearDetermine if a string can be segmented into words from a dictionary. Linear uses this DP problem to see if you can formulate dp[i] = 'can I form s[0..i-1] from the wordDict?' and handle the substring check efficiently.
By Alex Chen, Founder, InterviewChamp.AI · Last verified
Source citations
Public interview reports confirming this problem appears in Linear loops.
- Glassdoor (2025-12)— Cited in Linear SWE onsite reports as a DP string problem.
- Blind (2025-10)— Mentioned in Linear interview preparation threads as a mid-difficulty DP question.
Problem
Given a string s and a dictionary of strings wordDict, return true if s can be segmented into a space-separated sequence of one or more dictionary words. Note that the same word in the dictionary may be reused multiple times in the segmentation.
Constraints
1 <= s.length <= 3001 <= wordDict.length <= 10001 <= wordDict[i].length <= 20s and wordDict[i] consist of only lowercase English letters.All the strings of wordDict are unique.
Examples
Example 1
s = "leetcode", wordDict = ["leet","code"]trueExample 2
s = "applepenapple", wordDict = ["apple","pen"]trueExplanation: 'apple pen apple' — the word 'apple' is reused.
Example 3
s = "catsandog", wordDict = ["cats","dog","sand","and","cat"]falseApproaches
1. Naive recursion with memoization
Try every possible split point. Recurse on the suffix if the prefix is in wordDict. Memoize on the current index.
- Time
- O(n^2 * m)
- Space
- O(n)
function wordBreak(s, wordDict) {
const wordSet = new Set(wordDict);
const memo = new Map();
function dp(start) {
if (start === s.length) return true;
if (memo.has(start)) return memo.get(start);
for (let end = start + 1; end <= s.length; end++) {
if (wordSet.has(s.slice(start, end)) && dp(end)) {
memo.set(start, true);
return true;
}
}
memo.set(start, false);
return false;
}
return dp(0);
}Tradeoff: Top-down DP. Memoization prevents redundant recomputation. O(n^2) substrings * O(m) set lookup per substring worst case.
2. Bottom-up DP (canonical)
dp[i] = true if s[0..i-1] can be segmented. For each i, check all j < i where dp[j] is true and s[j..i-1] is in the word set.
- Time
- O(n^2)
- Space
- O(n)
function wordBreak(s, wordDict) {
const wordSet = new Set(wordDict);
const dp = new Array(s.length + 1).fill(false);
dp[0] = true; // empty prefix is always valid
for (let i = 1; i <= s.length; i++) {
for (let j = 0; j < i; j++) {
if (dp[j] && wordSet.has(s.slice(j, i))) {
dp[i] = true;
break;
}
}
}
return dp[s.length];
}Tradeoff: O(n^2) time (n^2 substring checks), O(n) space. Iterative, no recursion overhead. dp[0] = true is the key base case — the empty prefix requires no words.
Linear-specific tips
Define the DP state before coding: 'dp[i] is true if the first i characters of s can be formed using words in the dictionary.' Then explain the transition: 'dp[i] is true if there exists some j < i where dp[j] is true and s[j..i] is in wordDict.' Linear grades this problem on DP state definition clarity, not just working code.
Common mistakes
- Not setting dp[0] = true — the empty prefix is the base case; without it, no word can ever be matched.
- Using indexOf instead of a Set for word lookup — O(n) per lookup makes the overall solution O(n^3).
- Not using slice correctly — s.slice(j, i) gives characters from index j to i-1 (inclusive).
Follow-up questions
An interviewer at Linear may pivot to one of these next:
- Word Break II (LC 140) — return all valid segmentations (backtracking + memoization).
- What if the wordDict is very large but words are short? (Trie lookup instead of set.)
- How does adding a Trie improve the solution when many words share prefixes?
Solve it now
Free. No sign-up. Python and JavaScript run instantly in your browser.
FAQ
Why is dp[0] = true?
It represents the empty prefix, which trivially satisfies 'can be segmented.' Without it, no word starting at index 0 would ever fire the dp[j] && wordSet.has(...) condition.
Can I use a Trie instead of a Set?
Yes — a Trie gives O(L) lookup per word where L is word length, and naturally prunes branches that don't match any prefix. Worth mentioning as an optimization for very large dictionaries.
What's the difference between top-down and bottom-up here?
Both are O(n^2). Top-down memoization is often easier to reason about from the recursion. Bottom-up fills a table iteratively. Either is acceptable at Linear.
Practice these live with InterviewChamp.AI
Drill Word Break and other Linear interview questions under real-loop conditions with instant feedback on your reasoning, complexity claims, and code.
Practice these live with InterviewChamp.AI →