Skip to main content

9th Way Insignia

Software Developer (.NET Core)

United States - Remote (Remote)From $110kmidAdded today

About this role

Mid-level .NET Core developer supporting the VA's Data Management Center, maintaining and enhancing a portfolio of government web applications while ensuring compliance, security, and accessibility standards. You'll work on modernizing legacy systems to Azure and ASP.NET Core while sustaining active applications under federal oversight.

What you'll do

  • Develop and modify C#, .NET Core MVC, and .NET Framework v4.8 applications with JavaScript and CSS
  • Write SQL queries, stored procedures, and maintain database objects for application functionality
  • Perform hands-on coding, unit testing, debugging, and technical documentation
  • Support defect resolution, break/fix activity, and system sustainment
  • Ensure Section 508, ADA, and WCAG 2.0 Level A/AA accessibility compliance
  • Use Azure DevOps for source control, work tracking, and CI/CD pipeline management

What they're looking for

  • C# and .NET Core MVC
  • .NET Framework 4.8
  • SQL Server (queries, stored procedures)
  • JavaScript and CSS
  • Azure DevOps
  • Web accessibility (Section 508, WCAG)
  • Unit testing and debugging
  • Secure coding practices
Apply on the employer's site

Opens the official application on the employer’s site. No login required.

9th Way Insignia

9th Way Insignia builds secure, modernized software applications and data solutions for government clients, specializing in full-stack development, cloud architecture, and enterprise analytics. The company is hiring software developers, ETL developers, and Power BI developers to design and maintain applications, data pipelines, and reporting systems using Agile practices and modern technologies.

View all jobs at 9th Way Insignia

Likely interview questions

  • Describe your experience migrating legacy .NET Framework applications to .NET Core—what challenges did you encounter?
  • How have you ensured your code meets Section 508 and WCAG 2.0 accessibility requirements in past projects?