Honest, sourced guides for CS new-grad and early-career interviews. Read what works, skip what doesn't.
440+ deep-dive coding problems from 21 companies with optimal solutions
Company × role question sets sourced from Glassdoor, Levels.fyi, Blind
25 canonical algorithmic patterns with templates and example problems
35 canonical system design scenarios with capacity estimation
360+ LeetCode problems organized by topic with progressive hints
Short-form how-tos for behavioral, coding, and resume prep
Showing Live Interview AI (7 articles)
An AI coding interview means one of two things in 2026: a candidate using AI help during a coding assessment, or an employer using AI to generate, conduct, and grade the coding round itself. This guide covers both directions: what each platform tier tracks, what the rules usually allow, and how to prepare honestly.
Sam K. ·
Read more →An 'invisible screen' for interviews is an overlay window that stays off the screen you share, using the same operating-system setting password managers use for their pop-ups. It hides a window, not you: the webcam, the room, the platform's own recording and the company's rules all still apply. Free versions are mostly browser widgets that only stay out of frame while you share a single tab. Here is the honest 2026 picture.
Sam K. ·
Read more →An AI interview helper is software that uses generative AI to help candidates prepare for or assist during job interviews. The 2026 market splits into seven categories: practice mode, live overlays, coding-specific, behavioral-specific, question-bank, system design, and mobile. This mega-guide walks through every category, the free options worth using, the GitHub open-source landscape, what Reddit actually says, and which helpers earn the offer versus borrow one.
Sam K. ·
Read more →The CS interview cheating economy is the market of AI cheater tools, browser answer extensions, hidden overlays, and human proxies that secretly answer questions during technical interviews. Industry estimates suggest 30-48% of remote technical interviews in 2026 involve some form of AI assistance, and the paid tools run $30-200/month. This guide documents what's sold, why it backfires, and the honest path through it.
Sam K. ·
Read more →An AI interview helper is software that uses generative AI to help candidates prepare for or perform during job interviews. The market splits into practice-mode helpers (mock interviews, drills, feedback before the interview) and live-mode helpers (real-time answer overlays during the interview). This guide is the honest-prep position: the best AI interview helper is the one you close before the round starts.
Sam K. ·
Read more →Tools sold as 'stealth' coding assistants are desktop overlays and browser extensions that read a live coding question and suggest AI answers in a window hidden from the screen share. The 2026 reality: hiding a window does not make anyone undetectable, using one against a company's rules is cheating, the offer-rescission risk is real, and the candidates who land jobs build the skill before the round. This guide covers what these tools really do, what a hidden window does not change, the legal and blacklist landscape, four habits from these tools that DO work for honest prep, and what to use instead if you want to actually get hired.
Sam K. ·
Read more →The people on the call notice more than the software does. Interviewers pick up on answers that sound recited, follow-up questions a candidate can't handle, and gaps between the interview, the resume, and earlier rounds. Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, and Webex are meeting software: they carry your webcam, your microphone, and the screen you choose to share, and the interview's rules come from the company, not the app. More companies now add proctored assessments and in-person final rounds, and the job checks the skill after that. This is the honest picture in 2026: what Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, Webex, HireVue, HackerRank, and CodeSignal record, what interviewers actually notice, and the checks that run after the call.
Sam K. ·
Read more →